Asset management software, configured to your sector
MeltX is configured for six sectors: government and PSU, BFSI, manufacturing, healthcare, education, and IT services. An asset register means something different to a zilla parishad, a plant and a diagnostics chain, so the platform does not change; the hierarchy, the workflow and the statutory clock do.
- 6
- Sectors served
- 12
- Modules to draw from
- 1
- Asset spine underneath
What changes
One accountable record per department, with statutory clocks running in the system and procurement available through GeM.
Government and PSU
Departments, urban local bodies, zilla parishads, boards and public sector undertakings running services across many small offices under continuous audit.
What usually goes wrong
- Asset registers that cannot be produced on demandDepartmental assets are recorded in ledgers held by individual sections, so a consolidated register is compiled only when an audit demands one.
- Statutory timelines missed on process, not on meritRTI applications, enforcement notices and appeals slip past their limits because the clock is tracked on paper rather than in a system.
- Procurement that has to fit the rules exactlyBuying software must run through GeM or a tender process, with MSME and Make in India considerations documented.
Modules that apply
More on Government and PSU
What changes
Verified onboarding with a retained consent trail, a complete branch asset position, and security controls that produce their own evidence.
BFSI and NBFC
Banks, cooperative banks, non banking financial companies and financial infrastructure organisations operating under continuous regulatory examination.
What usually goes wrong
- Onboarding that cannot evidence what it verifiedIdentity checks are performed by reading documents rather than validating them against the source, and the consent trail is incomplete.
- Branch assets outside the registerEquipment across branches is bought locally and never reaches the central asset register, so depreciation and insurance are both wrong.
- Security controls that must be demonstrablePatch currency, remote access control and audit trails are examined, and assurance is not the same as evidence.
Modules that apply
What changes
Plant assets tracked to their location and custodian, preventive maintenance raised automatically, and depreciation computed consistently.
Manufacturing
Plants and multi location manufacturers where capital equipment is the balance sheet and downtime is measured in shifts.
What usually goes wrong
- Plant assets that move without a recordEquipment is transferred between lines, plants and cost centres informally, so the register and the shop floor stop agreeing.
- Maintenance driven by failureServicing happens after a breakdown because preventive schedules live in individual memory rather than in the system.
- Depreciation complexity under Schedule IIComponentisation and shift based rates are applied manually, so the same error repeats across every reporting period.
Modules that apply
What changes
Service and calibration history against every instrument, verification across all locations, and a patch position that can be stated.
Healthcare and diagnostics
Hospitals, diagnostic chains and laboratories where equipment availability is a clinical issue, not only a financial one.
What usually goes wrong
- Critical equipment with no service historyCalibration, warranty and service records sit with vendors, so the true condition of an instrument is unknown until it fails.
- Assets distributed across collection centresEquipment spread across small locations is difficult to verify, and losses are discovered long after they occur.
- Patient data systems that must stay patchedClinical and laboratory systems carry sensitive data and cannot be left on unsupported software.
Modules that apply
What changes
Department wise custody of every asset, grant funded purchases traceable, and campus property obligations tracked with alerts.
Education
Education societies, trusts, colleges and institutions managing campuses, laboratories, IT estates and leased premises under trustee oversight.
What usually goes wrong
- Laboratory and IT assets untracked between sessionsEquipment is issued to departments and never reconciled, so shortages appear at the start of each academic session.
- Grant funded assets that must be accounted for separatelyAssets purchased under specific grants need their own trail, and reconstructing it later is slow.
- Campus property and lease obligationsLeases, permissions and renewals are held in files rather than tracked with dates and owners.
Modules that apply
What changes
Custody proven for every device, licence position defensible before an audit, and SLA performance reported from recorded data.
IT and ITES
Technology companies and service providers whose entire estate is IT, and whose clients ask for evidence of how it is governed.
What usually goes wrong
- Device custody across a distributed workforceLaptops move with employees between offices, homes and client sites, and recovery at exit is inconsistent.
- Licence exposure discovered lateEntitlement is tracked in purchase folders while installations grow, so the gap appears only during a publisher audit.
- Client SLA commitments that must be evidencedContractual response and resolution targets are reported from spreadsheets, which clients increasingly refuse to accept.
Modules that apply
See it against your own register
Configured around your asset classes before the call. Thirty minutes.
- No obligation
- Run on your register
- Answered within a business day